Critical Minerals and Energy Intelligence

REalloys signs term sheet for up to 75-year US Army lease for Utah heavy rare-earths plant

  • REalloys signed a non-binding term sheet with the US Army for a dysprosium and terbium processing plant on about 200 acres of Tooele Army Depot, Utah
  • the proposed lease runs 50 years with one 25-year renewal, and the Army would get the first chance to buy output but no obligation to buy it
  • China holds what the Army calls a “near 100% global monopoly” on dysprosium and terbium, the heavy rare earths that keep magnets in missiles, radar and electric motors working at high temperatures

 

REalloys has taken a step towards building a heavy rare-earths processing plant on US Army land in Utah after signing a non-binding term sheet with the Army for a lease of up to 75 years at Tooele Army Depot.

The announcement comes less than two months before the Pentagon stops buying weapons that contain Chinese rare-earth magnets on January 1, 2027, as we reported in Pentagon’s China rare earth ban starts on Jan 1, but new supply can take 10 years.

The term sheet is not a signed lease, and instead sets out the main terms both sides would negotiate into a final Enhanced Use Lease, a deal that lets the Army rent spare land to private companies — and part of the US Army strategy to turn bases into critical mineral safe havens.

What REalloys and the Army have agreed

The plant would sit on about 200 acres and process and refine dysprosium and terbium, with other rare earths possible later if both sides agree in writing.

Those two metals are added to neodymium magnets so they keep their strength at high temperatures, in precision-guided munitions, electric motors, sonar and radar.

Under the proposed terms, REalloys would:

  • develop, finance, build, operate and eventually decommission the plant, while the US keeps title to the land
  • hold an initial 50-year lease with one 25-year renewal option, subject to Army consent
  • pay annual base rent at fair market value from the start of the lease, plus a share of revenue (“participation rent”) once commercial operations begin

 

The Army would get a right of first offer on the plant’s output, but it is not obliged to buy anything.

The release gives no capacity, cost or start date for the Utah plant.

Tooele itself is a 43,000-acre ammunition depot set up in 1942, which the Army said in April had land to spare for private partners. Its model is Pine Bluff Arsenal in Arkansas, where Hanwha Defense is making a US$1.3 billion private investment in an explosives plant on Army land.

Jeff Waksman, the Army’s principal deputy assistant secretary for installations, energy and environment, set out why the Army wants the deal:

“Rare earth processing is a known national security vulnerability, with China specifically holding a near 100% global monopoly on dysprosium and terbium.”

Jeff Waksman, US Army

Why heavy rare earths matter

Bar chart of China's share of global magnet rare earths in 2024, according to the IEA: 60% of mining, 91% of refining and 94% of magnet production

China produced 91% of the world’s refined rare earths and about 94% of the magnets that use dysprosium and terbium in 2024, according to the IEA.

Beijing has required licences to export seven medium and heavy rare earths, including dysprosium and terbium, since April 4, 2025. That rule was never part of the US–China trade truce, unlike a wider October 2025 package of controls whose suspension runs until November 10. Beijing said in September that the wider truce would be extended to January 10, 2027, but as of early November it had published no legal notice extending the suspension.

The result is an increasingly two-price market: in Europe, dysprosium and terbium cost around five times more than in China, according to the IEA.

That is the opportunity for a processor outside China, and Washington is already paying to build them.

Other US government rare-earth deals

The Pentagon and the Commerce Department have backed numerous rare-earth companies since mid-2025, including:

 

Together, these deals add up to about US$3 billion of public support, by our calculation, but most of it is loans: about US$2.15 billion, including up to US$1.3 billion for USA Rare Earth that is paid out only as the company hits milestones.

Bar chart of selected US government rare-earth deals since 2025 in US$ million, totalling about US$3 billion by our calculation: USA Rare Earth 1,577 (277 funding plus up to 1,300 loans), Vulcan Elements 670 conditional or non-binding, MP Materials 550 (400 equity, 150 loan), Lynas 96 offtake, ReElement 80 conditional loan, Ucore 22.4 grant, REalloys Tooele land lease only with no money

(About US$750 million, for Vulcan and ReElement, is still conditional or non-binding, and Lynas’s US$96 million buys rare-earth products rather than investing in the company.)

The Army deal is different: it offers land, not money. In Waksman’s words, it is designed to work “without putting any taxpayer dollars at risk.”

It is also part of a wider Army programme, when in June the Army conditionally selected four companies to process graphite, lithium, boron and heavy rare earths on four bases, and REalloys is the only rare-earths project among them.

It is the second to sign a term sheet, after Titan Mining agreed terms for a graphite plant at Anniston Army Depot, Alabama in October.

Where Utah fits in REalloys’ plans

Nasdaq-listed REalloys (ALOY) is building what it calls a “mine-to-magnet” chain, and Utah would add to projects already under way, for example:

 

REalloys ended June with US$122.4 million in cash after a US$100 million share placement, and says it has committed about US$58.3 million to fund the Saskatoon upgrade and the metal plant through commissioning.

In other words, Utah would give REalloys a US site under Army protection for the next step: refining heavy rare earths at home rather than in Canada.

What could prove this wrong

The term sheet can still fall away. Before a final lease is signed, the two sides must agree the rent, the Army must accept REalloys’ development plan, and the project must pass:

  • environmental reviews and permitting
  • a review of foreign ownership, control or influence
  • project financing and REalloys board approval
  • Army determinations and notification to Congress

 

If those conditions are not met or waived within 18 months, either side can walk away.

The “75-year deal” is the maximum: 50 years plus a 25-year renewal that needs Army consent, under a lease that does not yet exist.

There is also no guaranteed buyer, as a right of first offer means the Army sees the product first, not that it must purchase it, and the release puts no figure on the plant’s cost or how REalloys would pay for it.

Supply is the other question. There is no mine on the base, so the plant would depend on feedstock from elsewhere, and Chief Executive Leonard Sternheim told Fox Business a Western supply chain is more likely by 2029 or 2030 than overnight. As we wrote in our earlier article:

“New mines and refineries are coming, but on the industry’s timeline of years, not the Pentagon’s deadline of weeks.”

The Oregon Group

If the Tooele deal becomes a lease, the Army will have done something money alone has not: put heavy rare-earth refining inside a US military fence, reinforcing the national security support for secure rare earth supply.

Subscribe for Investment Insights. Stay Ahead.

Investment market and industry insights delivered to you in real-time.

Disclaimer

The Oregon Group maintains full editorial control over all content published on this website. While sponsored and advertised placements may be featured, the content remains the sole opinion of The Oregon Group. The author may receive compensation or remuneration for providing content, but all statements and expressions are made independently and are not influenced by sponsors or advertisers. From time to time, The Oregon Group and its directors, officers, partners, employees, authors, or members of their families, as well as persons who are interviewed for articles on this website, may have a long or short position in securities or commodities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities or commodities in the open market or otherwise. By accessing and using this website, readers are cautioned to assume that each of the foregoing persons may have a financial interest in all companies and sectors mentioned on this website. Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable., and any such statements are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur.  Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities or commodities discussed herein. The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and The Oregon Group undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material. The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and is not, directly or indirectly, an offer, solicitation of an offer and/or a recommendation to buy or sell any security or commodity, and the information provided on this website should not be construed as any advice or an opinion as to the price at which the securities of any company or commodity may trade at any time. The Oregon Group is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor.  We do not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient, and the information provided on this website is not and should not be construed as personal, financial, investment or professional advice. Readers are cautioned to always do their own research and review of publicly available information and to consult their professional and registered advisors before purchasing or selling any securities or commodities and should not rely on the information contained herein. Neither The Oregon Group nor any of its affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein. By using the Site or any affiliated social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Share this article

about the author

Picture of The Oregon Group

The Oregon Group

The Oregon Group is an investment research team focused on critical minerals, mining, energy and geopolitics.

Tags

Subscribe Now

Subscribe for in-depth market and industry intelligence you won’t find in the headlines.

Recommended to Read NEXT

GET FREE INVESTMENT INSIGHTS

Investment intelligence and in-depth reports on critical minerals, mining, energy and geopolitics — from capital-markets professionals with boardroom and institutional experience.